First Case of Suspect's Identity Disclosure for Attempted Murder in Korea

On July 31, 2025, it was confirmed that the police are discussing whether to disclose the identity of a man in his 30s, who has been arrested for allegedly attempting to murder a woman in her 20s with a knife. This case marks the first instance in South Korea where a suspect facing attempted murder charges may have their identity revealed. To proceed with the disclosure, a committee must be formed, including external experts, to evaluate the situation. Previously, no suspect charged with attempted murder has had their identity disclosed in the country.

The suspect, referred to as A, was apprehended after allegedly attacking the woman in a hospital parking lot in Ulsan on July 28. Reports indicate that A had been stalking the victim prior to the incident. During a police meeting on the same day, it was decided that the committee would consider the victim's opinion before making a final decision on the disclosure. The victim, who has undergone multiple surgeries, remains in critical condition.

According to the law regarding the disclosure of information about suspects in serious crimes, identity disclosure is permitted if the crime was committed in a brutal manner, if there is sufficient evidence of the suspect's guilt, and if it serves the public interest, such as preventing reoffending. Minors are exempt from such disclosures. If the committee decides to disclose A's identity, it could include his name, age, and photograph.

The committee must consist of at least seven and no more than ten members, with more than half being external individuals. Only police officers of the rank of superintendent or higher can participate. A two-thirds majority is required for the disclosure to proceed.

If A's identity is disclosed, it would be a significant precedent, as the police have only disclosed identities in 61 cases since 2010, with none specifically for attempted murder. In a previous case in January 2022, a suspect who attacked a political figure was also considered for identity disclosure but was ultimately kept confidential.

On the day of the attack, A reportedly chased the victim and stabbed her multiple times. Despite having a smartwatch that could have alerted the police, the victim was unable to use it during the attack. A attempted to flee in a vehicle but was stopped by bystanders and subsequently arrested by the police. He was detained on July 30 due to concerns he might flee. During questioning, A claimed he had the knife for self-harm and denied any premeditated intent. However, police believe the circumstances indicate a planned and brutal crime, as A had violated a restraining order by waiting for the victim outside her workplace before the attack.